Letter #5
from The
SLIPLOVER
Bill,
How nice of you to write to me, and share your site information. The "Pond" had indicated to me, that they loved my site, and just took it upon themselves to link my page to theirs. Looks like they did the same toYOU...but at least they TOLD me ! lol.
It would seem I've already been sending business your way! You see...I'm a reader of LEGSHOW...and I sent your ad information to m_____r, who in turn ordered and received "Petticoat Junction". I've seen it....and was thrilled beyond any possible description !! I've also recommended your service to another "on line" contact (Ju_______m)...aka....A_____r, from A______. He ordered Three of your tapes, and a Fourth that YOU talked him into ! : ) I believe they were "Petticoat Junction" , "Slips", Slips II", and "Blizzard".
You mentioned that "petticoats (can-cans, crinolines, whatever you wanna' call them) drive (you) crazy." That they're your "Favorite thing".
Well, Bill...you're FAR from alone ! Since becoming an "on liner"...I've chatted with HUNDREDS of slip lovers that share your love for the petticoats...myself included! I, TOO have a very large collection (at least my Wife does), of "Vintage" petticoats from the 1950's and 1960's...along with a hundred, or so Slips. (not including MY personal collection of slips...which I'll cover later).
A little about myself. As you have seen by my web site...I'm a lover of SLIPS. To ME..and others LIKE me, there is NOTHING sexier than a woman clad in a white, or light pastel, soft...silky...lace trimmed slip. By only leaving the statement as that....one could easily be confused to think that it's the ONLY thing we like the woman to be wearing...and nothing could be further from the truth. First, I grew up in the 1950's and 1960's..and a woman in her silky panties...was the BEST that we saw in any of the magazines we found. To this day...a womans sexual organ, COVERED with a patch of the silky nylon material represents, in our minds....the TRUE female sex organ.
So, you see Bill...it's not JUST the slip...it's the fact that the slip is the last veil before the panties !. When I see a movie where the woman unzips her dress....let's it fall to the floor..and then she's Naked...it's such a letdown. Well, when a woman is in a slip..and removes it, or has it removed and she's then naked...that's not much better. We, as slip lovers, love the Panties, garters and stockings..high heels TOO. We just love all that to be COVERED with the slip, or layers of slips. I can remember seeing a girl sitting..and letting her legs open. I saw up her skirt enough to see the slip wrapped around her legs. Up a bit further, I could make out the white nylon patch of her silky panties. Hmmmmmmmm Such a turn on !!.
Another woman struck the same pose, only was NOT wearing any panties..and I felt let down..as though I were missing an entire course of a multi-course dinner! I was not turned on by her nakedness. I'm making this point, because I've heard that many of your "Slip" videos may show all kinds of slips...the women are naked beneath...and even spend a great portion of the video masturbation themselves. This is NOT a slip lovers' idea of a "slip" video. ...and he'll generally only watch the portions containing the slips COVERING the vagina...and only Imagine panties are beneath.
[ SLIPS! & SLIPS II were shot as a custom production for a customer who specified slips, slips, more slips and _nothing_ but slips—no bras, panties, hose, etc. Otherwise, I would have included all the appropriate acoutrements. -B.]
In your opinion..."no woman is properly dressed without them! (Or properly undressed.)"...you make a valid point, but I'll take it the one step further, and say In MY opinion...no woman is Properly dressed (or undressed) without a slip, AND panties. The panties can always come off in the end....but then the show's over. There is nothing left to the imagination.
Slip "fetishist" (and I'm SURE you know this) .. masturbate with slips, as opposed to oils, or lotions..etc. ..just as a "panty fetishist" uses panties....and a "girdle fetishist" uses girdles. Each respective fetishist enjoys the "feeling" of the item of their fetish as a stimulus for reaching orgasm. The ULTIMATE climax, is the Visual (your videos) along with the tactile sensation. While privately watching m_______'s copy of Petticoat Junction....I'll admit that I'm STILL cuming !! The way she shows her petticoats, and then her Panties !!! Hanging upside down, rubbing her pantied crotch on the bar...touching herself on her panties...MY GOD, was that sexy...and brought me to countless orgasms, BUT.....when she exposed herself....i.e. her naked vagina...I just fast forwarded through that part, if it was too long...trying to get back to the Panties and Petticoats.
If more of your videos are of the "teasing" and "Taunting" type, like that...I'd LOVE to link you, review same..and recommend your site and service to my readers. I'll forwarn them, about the graphic terminologies in your descriptions....but also guide them as to what videos, if any they'd LOVE.
I KNOW you have a wide audience...and you have to make everyone happy..but just remember, a SLIP LOVER is such, because he is turned on by the MYSTERY...not the REALITY. They love slips, because the slip HIDES what's there...and when silky panties, worn beneath the slip become visible...it only heightens the pleasure because they're combined as a visual....and although panties hide a bit less...they still COVER, and leave that final step to the mystery. If they wanted to see raw vaginas....the web is overflowing with sources to do fill that need.
I hope I've not been rude by expressing my opinion...it was not my intention to do so. You asked me, due to the name "sliplover5"...if there were more than one "sliplover" on aol. There's only one by that name, that I'm aware of...but there are hundreds of names on my list, of those that truely love slips...and not one has dissagreed with my description of the sliplover, loving the panties, too. It's a MUST. The panties NEED to be there, as part of the slip show. (btw....the "Briefs" you describe ALWAYS win over "thongs" as an alternative !! lol
Regarding your "boiler plates" It's good marketing ! If your ads are working....and making you money....leave them work.
In your email, you wrote the following:
>I'd appreciate a link. It might not be appropriate, since much of my site is
>blatantly and explicitly erotic and sexual (at least verbally—there's not
>much visual stuff there), but if you think any of the visitors to your site
>might be interested in the descriptions of my products, I'd be grateful for
>a link. I'll also link your site to mine, but only with your permission,
>again because of the overtly sexual nature of my site, you might not
>necessarily want to be associated with it by reference.
>Also, I'd be pleased to snail-mail you a print copy of my brochure with a
>sample photo, free of charge, if you care to risk your postal address. If
>you'd write a review of any of my videos and publish it on your site, I'd
>provide a complimentary copy for that purpose.
I'd like to provide a link to your site, with the understanding that my visitors will be forwarned of the explicit descriptions. My PO BOX is on my index page...just below the image, but I'll be glad to give it to you.
I'd also be interested in reviewing, and publishing same on my web site...but I'll be frightfully honest. If the video turns out to be 15 minutes of slips, with no panties....and an hour and 45 minutes of masturbation...I'll review it accordingly. (That's what I heard about "Slips". A friend let me borrow, and therefore I've seen both "Slips II"....and "Blizzard"...and despite the fact that panties are not worn in "Slips II" I would STILL recommend it to my visitors. "BLIZZARD", was the same girl from "Petticoat Junction" and Very very sexy AND "productive"!!! (Again..I just fast forward through the masturbation section) I'd award that one, 3 1/2 erections !!! I THOUGHT the petticoats and quilted skirt on "Angel" looked familiar !
You mentioned that "MOST" of your videos contain slips. Perhaps some of your featured "Panty" videos would be more to what my visitors and readers would like...if they're predominantly Panties and slips, or slips TO panties. I don't know. I've never seen any of those.
Let me know what you think of what I've said so far...and if we can agree....I'll be happy to link you to my site.
Dave
PS. I'm a member of SAG...and I'm both an actor, AND Stand-up comic....so I'm familar with both "before the camera" and "behind the camera" techniques. Your "three camera" simulation is not bad at ALL.
[This is excerpted from another e-mail from Dave]:
...
>Female is Kaye, my production asst and part-time general factotum. She's
>"Blair" from "At the Gyn" video. She's half my age, married, and has a
>girlfriend (I think she might be bi). Almost couldn't do it without her!! I
>maintain that there is __NO__ female who can appreciate and understand the
>effects of lingerie on a male the way a male does. But she comes as close as
>you could want. She "gets" it, at least intellectually.
I'm glad she DOES "get it", at least intellectually, but in "Petticoat
Junction" (the video I reviewed). I heard her give a direction to Cindy to
"Pull the panties up to make them look like Thongs." My voice AND your
voice on the tape simultaneously said "NO, DON'T !"...and then you added
"That's for someone else's video....not mine." To which I audibly replied
"THANK YOU!" LOL God, I hate THONGS !! (ass floss !)